Banking UP

Only last November, I wrote about how 75% of our mobile customers were using a smartphone to access their account. Well, 2 months later, the number is now beyond 80%:

• 56.7% Android
• 24.2% iPhone

This penetration ratio is astounding. The technical team at Plastyc is getting itchy to release the applications we have prepared for both platforms.

Below is a sneak preview of the iPhone application:

Once released, anyone among the 80%+ with a smartphone will be able to manage the entirety of their account without touching a PC again.

According to the Economist’s special report on personal technology of October 8, 2011, the Personal Computer is on its way out.

Consumers will gradually ditch their laptop or desktop computers in favor of smart phones and tablets to handle their everyday online activities. It turns out that the early adopters of smart phones are not only the young and the geeks. They are also people who find them more convenient and cheaper than PCs. Many of them have also disconnected their land-line phone for the same reason.

I surprised many of my industry peers in the past few weeks when I told them that 75% of the people who access their UPside Visa prepaid card account from their cell phone, do so from a smart phone. It is counter-intuitive that consumers with limited access to large banks would be equipped with the latest and greatest mobile phone technology.

Here is the proof. This is our mobile server logs, detailing what type of mobile browser has been used to access accounts from cell phone during the past 3 weeks:

• 49.6% Android browsers
• 24.1% Safari (i.e. iPhone) browsers

Most wireless network operators now offer an Android phone with their low-cost no-contract prepaid cellphone plans. Kudos to Metro PCS, Virgin Mobile, Cricket Wireless, Boost Wireless, Simple Mobile, T-Mobile, AT&T, Verizon and others for providing your customers with very good phones on prepaid plans.

The new iPhone prices announced by Apple on October 4 will also help increase their penetration among consumers who are usually considered to be late adopters.

This is a big change from only 18 months ago, when only 30% of our customers had a smartphone. Guess what? We are frantically working on a mobile banking smartphone application that will surpass anything available to the under-banked.

On September 6, Congress passed the “American Invents Act”, a rather complicated bill attempting to fix or reduce the issues with filing, granting and post-grant reviewing of US patents.
For a complete version of the act, see http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-112s23es/pdf/BILLS-112s23es.pdf

“Patents suck”, said Google chairman Eric Schmidt at the Dreamforce conference on September 1. In fact, Google purchased Motorola mobility in large part for its trove of mobile phone related patents, as a “weapon of mass defense”, because patents have become a tool to obtain financial compensation from competitors largely unrelated to the original intent of providing inventors a period of exclusivity on their inventions.

In July, the radio show This American Life, had a great piece called “When Patents Attack!” about “patent trolls” in the Eastern District of Texas who have no other purpose in life than extracting protection money from companies with real businesses and products. Instead of threatening to set the business on fire, mafia-style, they sue regardless of the merits of the patents they have purchased (of course they have not invented anything themselves), and offer to settle out of court for large amounts of money. Patents have become the equivalent of cans of fuels and boxes of matches.

The financial industry has not been spared by patent trolls. Visa, Wells Fargo, MasterCard, Bank of America, Citibank, and many others have been sued for alleged infringement of patents related to digital currency systems that were never implemented by the owner of the patents and would make any software engineer roll on the floor laughing at their triviality.

In an intriguing twist, the America Invents Act is requesting that the Director of the US Patents and Trademarks Office put a transitional post-grant process in place for reviewing  the validity of covered business-method patents. The definition of “covered business-method patents” is explicitly narrowed down to:

A patent that claims a method or corresponding apparatus for performing data processing operations utilized in the practice, administration, or management of a financial product or service, except that the term shall not include patents for technological inventions.

Being no lawyer myself, I interpret the  goal of this post-grant review process as being a way to facilitate the debunking of dubious patents, or the defense against patent trolls. It is rather interesting that lawmakers have chosen financial products and services as the target for this transitional process. I guess that they placed a high priority on limiting the use of patents as a weapon against innovators trying to oil the wheel of a stalled economy.

This week in New Orleans, the Center for Financial Services Innovation organized its 6th annual forum.

Plastyc will be part of a panel session about the “Young and Bankless“.

I will be talking about the myths and realities of young people & money, and will outline guidelines for building a prepaid card optimized for the 18-24.

Bump, POPmoney and Buxter are a few of the person-to-person (P2P) money transfer services introduced recently. They are preceded by a long line of failed attempts to beam money from one person to another that I have witnessed since my days in the smart card industry in the mid-90’s, when UK-based Mondex attempted chained electronic payments from an individual payer to the next.

As a particular category of payments, I am prepared to declare that P2P is hopeless, at least in the Western world.

There is no shortage of brilliant minds at PayPal, Obopay, Cashedge, Click & Buy or other market players jumping into P2P. It’s just that, when one of the two P’s is not a merchant trying to sell something to the other P, there are very few realistic use cases. And the barrier of requiring people to install software or sign up and remember a username and password is too high for most people, however cool the new P2P payment system may seem.

Even in the hyper-connected world of “Generation Y” consumers (teens and 20-somethings), I Owe You’s are usually settled with good old cash, and other modes of payment remain too infrequently used to justify new businesses.

At Plastyc, we have tens of thousands of customers using our more innovative features, such as suspending a misplaced card from a cell phone or sending paper checks to their landlord via our virtual checkbook. But our free, ultra-accessible Facebook P2P service for our UPside Visa cardholders is another matter. The service does not even require that the recipient of the money be a cardholder to start with, as we automatically offer him or her a new card to receive the money, if needed. The truth is: we have very little traffic with that service as compared with other features.

When I asked my own 20-year old son why he was not using it, he shrugged the question off as almost irrelevant: he buys online a lot, but he never has to send money to his friends.

So I can only imagine how little traction service providers may have when they charge for P2P money services, require more than just logging into a Facebook account, and perhaps insist on people installing an app on a mobile phone.

If one of the P’s is a “pseudo merchant” (over-used example: the piano teacher; more exotic example introduced recently by Square: the local glass-blowing artist), it’s a different story. Then we’re back into retail payment scenarios with the need for charge back rules and security compliance, which both require a trusted third party in the middle to ensure payment and resolve disputes.

If the two persons are in different countries, we are venturing in the world of international remittances. This is a huge market. But it is not for the faint of heart, because there are strict money transmitter licensing rules and anti-money-laundering regulations to comply with. There’s also a need to solve the “last mile” problem of making sure that the received money can be spent easily, usually in cash. Everybody wants to eat Western Union’s lunch in this market, but this will be an uphill battle.

Now, here is an example of a genuine P2P payment scenario that would make a difference and produce decent transaction volumes inside the US: parent-to-student allowances or emergency funding when the student is a few hundred miles away from mom and dad.

The US has 17.5 million people aged 18-20 who are too old for teen prepaid cards and too young now for their own individual credit card, since the CARD Act took effect last month.

Here are the issues and requirements for servicing these people:

• The transfer should not take days. At most a few hours: “Mom, my car broke down late last night and I need to get it towed to the garage this morning…” So bank transfers via ACH are out.
• The student should be able to spend the money in the brick-and-mortar world. Joe’s Towing does not accept PayPal.
• If Mom’s credit card is the source of transfer, it should really be Mom’s card, not someone else’s, which is difficult to verify because Mom probably does not live on campus and may have a different last name.
• If money is needed more frequently than in emergencies, then having both sides of the transfer walk or drive to a money transfer retail location like those operated by Western Union or Moneygram is too inconvenient and costly.

Solving the parent-to-student payment case is not as easy as it sounds. But because this is one of the few problems big enough to support innovative solutions, I expect new services to emerge soon to serve the Parent-to-Student (P2S?) market.